Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: B lymphocytes acquire myeloid and autoimmune phenotypes via the downregulation of lymphocyte-specific protein-1
doi: 10.1101/2024.06.28.600734
Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Flow cytometry was used to determine LSP1 expression levels in the peripheral B cells of healthy donors (HD, n=20) and SLE patients (n=18): MFI=mean fluorescence intensity. Disease activity was evaluated by the SLEDAI. b, LSP1 expression in cultured B cells from HDs (n=4) versus SLE B cells (n=4∼5) determined by flow cytometry. B cells were stimulated with αIgM, CD40L, and CpG for 3 days. c, qRT‒PCR analysis of ETS1 mRNA expression in B cells from HDs (n=18) and SLE patients (n=17, left panel) and its correlation with LSP1 mRNA expression in HDs (black circle) and SLE patients (blue circle, right panel). d,e, Regulation of LSP1 expression by ETS1. d , ETS1 and LSP1 mRNA expression in human B cells transfected with ETS1 siRNA, as evaluated by qRT‒PCR (n=4). e , qRT‒PCR analysis of Ets1 and Lsp1 mRNA in B cells from WT ( Ets1 fl/fl , n=8) and Ets1 -/- ( Ets1 fl/fl C d19 Cre/- , n=4) mice. f, LSP1 expression in WT B cells (n=6∼7) stimulated with αIgM and LPS for 5 days in the presence or absence of (pretreated) 20 μM hydralazine, 20 μM procainamide, or 1 μM 5-azacytidine, as examined by flow cytometry. g, TEM images of B cells from HDs and SLE patients. h, i, Immunofluorescence staining of MPO in HDs and SLE B cells using anti-MPO (red) and anti-CD19 (green) Abs and DAPI (blue). h , Representative images of MPO + B cells are indicated by white arrows. i , Percentage of MPO + B cells determined by analyzing 6 fields per sample (n=5 for HDs, n=4 for SLE patients). j, qRT‒PCR and ELISA results for MPO. Left: MPO mRNA expression in HDs (n=17) versus SLE B cells (n=15). Right: ELISA for MPO production by B cells from HDs (n=7) and SLE patients (n=5) activated with the indicated stimuli for 3 days. k, Flow cytometry analysis of LSP1 and MPO expression in CD19 + B cells from HDs (black circle, n=4) and SLE patients (blue circle, n=7). l, Left: LSP1 signature in SLE patients and its correlation with the type I IFN signature: n=24 for the low IFN signature, n=75 for the high IFN signature, and n=181 for HD. Bulk RNA-seq data from SLE PBMCs were obtained from a public database (GSE72509). Right: Estimated population size of monocytic cells by cellular deconvolution analysis. Each dot represents an SLE patient or HD. m , LSP1 signature score in B cells from SLE patients versus HDs determined by pseudobulk RNA-seq analysis (GSE174188; s ee Methods ). n, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) plot visualizing the B-cell subsets with high LSP1 scores (>0.8) in SLE patients. The data in the bar graphs are presented as the means ± SDs of at least two independent experiments. P values were determined by the Mann‒Whitney U test (left panels in a , c , and j ; all data in i ); one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons (right panel in a ); two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s, Dunnett’s multiple comparison or multiple t test ( b , d - f ; right panel in j ); and the Spearman correlation test (right panels in c and k ). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001.
Article Snippet: For gene knockdown, human LSP1 siRNA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-42899), ETS1 siRNA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-29309), or mouse PKCβ siRNA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-36255) was electroporated into B cells using an Amaxa Nucleofector (Lonza) and incubated as indicated.
Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Fluorescence, Activity Assay, Cell Culture, Transfection, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, RNA Sequencing, Comparison